MagSafe Wallet w/ Kickstand and Find My | Analysis by Brian Moineau

A smarter MagSafe wallet that actually does more than hold cards

People have been attaching slim wallets to the backs of their iPhones for years, but until recently those sticky card-holders were dumb leather pouches — handy, but vulnerable to loss. MOFT’s long-promised MagSafe wallet with a built-in kickstand and Apple Find My support finally arrives in stores, and it’s the kind of sensible, everyday upgrade that quietly solves a handful of real annoyances: losing your wallet, fumbling for a stand, and wondering whether a small accessory is dead when it goes missing.

Why this matters now

MOFT first teased a Find My–enabled MagSafe wallet at CES in January 2025. After completing Apple’s Find My certification and several refinements, the product is now broadly available (including on Apple’s online store) and priced around $49–50 — squarely undercutting many brand-name alternatives while adding tracking tech and a practical folding stand. The timing is notable: Apple’s own Find My–compatible leather wallet set a precedent for integrating tracking into MagSafe accessories, and MOFT brings that feature to a design category it helped popularize: the fold-flat stand-wallet hybrid. (9to5mac.com)

Quick takeaways

  • MOFT’s new MagSafe wallet combines a two-card wallet, an adjustable kickstand, and Apple Find My tracking in one compact MagSafe accessory. (apple.com)
  • It offers a rechargeable battery (MOFT lists an 80 mAh battery) and audible alerts + lost-mode support through the Find My network. (apple.com)
  • Price sits near $49.99 and it is available through MOFT and Apple; color options vary by retailer. (moft.us)

What MOFT actually built

MOFT isn’t trying to reinvent the wheel. Instead, it packed a few complementary features into one polished package:

  • MagSafe-compatible attachment that sticks to iPhones and MagSafe cases.
  • A fold-flat origami-style kickstand that supports portrait viewing (and usually landscape depending on case/thickness) — MOFT’s signature move. (moft.us)
  • Apple Find My integration: location reporting, lost mode, and “play a sound” functionality like other Find My accessories. MOFT advertises roughly 30 meters indoor and 40 meters outdoor Bluetooth range for direct tracking. (appleinsider.com)
  • Rechargeable battery to keep the tracker alive (MOFT lists an 80 mAh capacity) with multi-month standby depending on usage. (apple.com)
  • Splash resistance and durable materials in a vegan leather / eco-friendly finish, consistent with MOFT’s previous Snap-on wallets. (moft.us)

How it compares to Apple and other makers

  • Apple’s iPhone Leather Wallet with Find My set expectations for what a tracked MagSafe wallet can do (lost mode, detachment alerts, show on map). MOFT mirrors that functionality but adds the kickstand/stand wallet form factor many users already prefer. Apple’s support article explains how the standard wallet behaves in iOS; MOFT’s product implements the same Find My features. (support.apple.com)
  • Nomad and a few others have released tracked MagSafe wallets too, but with different trade-offs (Nomad’s leather wallet focuses on premium materials and slimness). MOFT’s advantage is the hybrid stand + wallet concept — a practical win for people who watch video or attend calls on the go. (theverge.com)
  • Price is competitive. MOFT’s ~$50 price point undercuts some premium leather options while offering a richer feature set than many $30–40 MagSafe sleeves. Availability through Apple lends credibility and broadens access. (apple.com)

Practical considerations before buying

  • Compatibility: Works best with iPhones that support MagSafe. Thicker cases or non-MagSafe phones may reduce magnet strength or interfere with the stand function. MOFT offers standard and Find My–enabled versions; make sure you choose the tracked model if that’s important. (moft.us)
  • Card capacity: Designed for 2 cards (MOFT’s spec); if you carry many cards or cash you’ll still need a separate wallet. (moft.us)
  • Battery life: MOFT lists an 80 mAh battery; real-world battery life depends on tracking frequency and how often you use sound/notifications. Other makers quote multi-month life — expect similar range but be prepared to recharge occasionally. (apple.com)
  • Find My behaviors: Like Apple’s wallet, MOFT’s accessory will show last known location and support Lost Mode and detachment notifications — useful for travel and everyday misplacements. (support.apple.com)

Why I think this one will stick

MOFT’s strength is design clarity: the company built a product people already liked (the snap-on stand-wallet) and added the one feature that mattered most to skeptics — real findability. It’s an incremental upgrade that addresses the top user fears (losing the wallet, losing the phone) without making the wallet bulky or gimmicky. Offering it via Apple’s storefront also signals that MOFT passed Apple’s certification hurdles, which matters when you rely on the Find My network. (moft.us)

My take

If you’re someone who uses a MagSafe wallet and also wants the convenience of a stand, or if you’ve felt that twinge of panic after leaving a wallet on a café table, MOFT’s Find My–enabled wallet is the sort of small, thoughtful upgrade that actually improves daily life. It’s not the cheapest option on the market, but its combination of tracking, kickstand functionality, and availability through Apple make it a sensible pick for many iPhone users.

Sources




Related update: We recently published an article that expands on this topic: read the latest post.


Related update: We recently published an article that expands on this topic: read the latest post.

ROG Xbox Ally X: A Portable Gaming | Analysis by Brian Moineau

The ROG Xbox Ally X: A Bold Attempt in a Fragmented Gaming Landscape

The gaming world is constantly evolving, and with that evolution comes a flurry of new devices and platforms vying for our attention. Enter the ROG Xbox Ally X—a device that promised to be the first portable “Xbox.” With high hopes riding on its performance and versatility, it aimed to unify the chaotic landscape of PC gaming. But did it deliver? Let’s dive into the nuanced insights provided by Ars Technica’s recent review to uncover the device’s strengths and shortcomings.

Context: The Rise of Portable Gaming Devices

The gaming industry has seen a significant shift toward portable devices in recent years. With the success of handheld consoles like the Nintendo Switch and the increasing popularity of mobile gaming, it’s no surprise that companies are eager to capitalize on this trend. The ROG Xbox Ally X was positioned as a potential game-changer, allowing gamers to experience their favorite Xbox titles on the go. However, the reality is that the gaming ecosystem is as fragmented as ever, filled with competing platforms that create a challenging environment for any new device.

Key Features and Review Insights

1. Performance vs. Compatibility: According to the Ars Technica review, while the ROG Xbox Ally X boasts impressive hardware specifications, its performance can be inconsistent across different titles. Gamers may find that not all Xbox Game Pass titles run smoothly, raising questions about the device’s overall compatibility with the vast Xbox library.

2. User Experience and Interface: The user experience is a mixed bag. The interface attempts to blend console and PC gaming, which can feel cluttered and confusing. This lack of cohesion might frustrate gamers who are accustomed to more intuitive systems.

3. Battery Life Concerns: One of the critical drawbacks highlighted in the review is the device’s battery life. In a world where portability is key, the ROG Xbox Ally X falls short, often requiring frequent recharging during extended gaming sessions.

4. Price Point and Value Proposition: Priced as a premium device, it faces stiff competition from other portable gaming options and even traditional gaming PCs. The review questions whether the ROG Xbox Ally X offers enough value for its price, especially when considering the fragmented gaming landscape.

5. Potential for Future Updates: While the current iteration may have its flaws, there is potential for improvement through software updates and optimizations. The gaming community will be watching closely to see if ASUS can address these concerns over time.

Concluding Reflection

The ROG Xbox Ally X is a bold venture into the portable gaming space, but its struggle to unify the chaotic world of competing gaming platforms is evident. As gamers, we crave seamless experiences that allow us to play wherever we are, but the current offering falls short in several key areas. While it’s easy to be excited about new technology, the ROG Xbox Ally X serves as a reminder that innovation must also deliver practical value to resonate with gamers.

As we move forward, it will be interesting to see how ASUS responds to feedback and whether they can refine the ROG Xbox Ally X into a device that meets the high expectations set by the gaming community.

Sources

– Ars Technica. “ROG Xbox Ally X: The Ars Technica review.” [Ars Technica](https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2023/10/rog-xbox-ally-x-the-ars-technica-review/).

By keeping an eye on updates and community feedback, we can hope for a future where portable gaming truly embraces the best of all worlds.




Related update: We recently published an article that expands on this topic: read the latest post.


Related update: We recently published an article that expands on this topic: read the latest post.


Related update: We recently published an article that expands on this topic: read the latest post.

MX Master 3S vs. 4: Upgrade or Stay? | Analysis by Brian Moineau

Logitech MX Master 3S vs. MX Master 4: Should You Upgrade?

Are you on the fence about upgrading your trusty Logitech MX Master 3S to the brand-new MX Master 4? You’re not alone! In the ever-evolving world of tech, it can be tough to decide when to stick with what you know versus diving into the latest and greatest gadgets. In this post, we’ll dive deep into the features of both mice, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.

A Quick Overview of the MX Master Series

The Logitech MX Master series has long been a favorite among tech enthusiasts, gamers, and professionals alike. Known for their ergonomic design, customizable buttons, and advanced tracking capabilities, these mice have carved out a loyal user base. The MX Master 3S was released to rave reviews, showcasing improvements over its predecessor, the MX Master 3. Now, Logitech has introduced the MX Master 4, which promises even more enhancements. But with the MX Master 3S still on the shelves, should you take the plunge into the MX Master 4, or is the older model still a worthy companion?

Features Comparison: MX Master 3S vs. MX Master 4

Both the MX Master 3S and MX Master 4 boast impressive features, but there are some key differences worth noting:

Design and Ergonomics: Both mice offer an ergonomic design, but the MX Master 4 is slightly refined for better comfort during extended use. It fits nicely in the hand, ensuring that long hours of work or gaming don’t lead to discomfort.

Battery Life and Charging: While the MX Master 3S offers a robust battery life, the MX Master 4 ups the ante with even longer usage between charges. If you’re someone who often forgets to plug in your devices, this could be a game-changer.

Tracking Technology: The MX Master 4 features Logitech’s latest tracking technology, which allows for smoother movement across various surfaces. Gamers and graphic designers, in particular, will appreciate this enhancement.

Customizable Buttons: Both models come with customizable buttons, but the MX Master 4 offers more options for customization, allowing users to tailor their experience even further.

Price Point: The MX Master 3S is still available at a lower price point, making it an attractive option for those who don’t need the absolute latest features.

Key Takeaways

Ergonomics: The MX Master 4 features improved ergonomics for better comfort during long usage sessions. – Battery Life: The new model boasts longer battery life, making it ideal for heavy users. – Enhanced Tracking: The MX Master 4’s upgraded tracking technology provides smoother performance on multiple surfaces. – Customization Options: More customizable buttons are available on the MX Master 4, allowing for a more personalized experience. – Cost Consideration: The MX Master 3S remains a solid choice at a lower price, especially for those who may not need the latest features.

Should You Upgrade?

Deciding whether to upgrade from the MX Master 3S to the MX Master 4 really comes down to your specific needs and usage patterns. If you find yourself using your mouse for long hours and prioritize comfort and advanced features, the MX Master 4 is worth considering. However, if you’re satisfied with the performance of your MX Master 3S and don’t feel the need for the latest enhancements, then sticking with your current mouse might be the best choice for now.

In the end, both mice are excellent options, each catering to different user preferences. Whether you choose to upgrade or not, you can’t go wrong with either model from Logitech’s stellar lineup.

Conclusion

In the fast-paced world of technology, staying updated with the latest gadgets can feel overwhelming. However, the Logitech MX Master 3S and MX Master 4 both deliver exceptional performance, catering to a wide range of users. Ultimately, the decision to upgrade comes down to personal preference, comfort, and specific usage needs. Happy clicking!

Sources

– “Logitech MX Master 3S vs. MX Master 4: Should You Upgrade?” – PCMag {URL to article}

*Remember to check out the latest reviews and user feedback to ensure you’re making the best choice for your tech needs!*




Related update: We recently published an article that expands on this topic: read the latest post.