Day 2 NFL Combine Winners and Losers | Analysis by Brian Moineau

Who Won and Who Lost on Day 2 of the 2026 NFL Combine

The combine is where tape meets timers — and on Day 2 in Indianapolis that collision produced winners and losers in equal measure. Friday’s focus on defensive backs and tight ends turned the spotlight on speed, burst and catch radius, and a handful of prospects answered with headline-making numbers while others left more questions than answers. Here’s a readable take on Chad Reuter’s Day 2 stock report and what it means for the draft board.

Why Day 2 mattered

  • Day 2 showcased cornerbacks, safeties and tight ends — positions where physical testing can dramatically reshape projections.
  • Athletic testing (40-yard dash, 10-yard splits, vertical/broad jumps) matters, but so do on-field drills and how a player’s testing complements his tape.
  • With the draft less than two months away (April 23–25, 2026 in Pittsburgh), a strong combine can vault a mid-round candidate into Day 2 consideration — and a subpar one can push a potential Day 2 pick toward Day 3 or beyond.

Quick hits from the report

  • Daylen Everette (Georgia, CB) ran like a man bringing a clipboard: a 4.38 40 with a 1.54 10-yard split, 37.5" vertical, clean ball skills in drills — an eye-opener that could bump him toward Round 2 if teams buy the athletic testing over middling 2025 tape. (NFL.com)
  • Kenyon Sadiq (Oregon, TE) posted absurd testing for a tight end: 4.39 40 at 241 pounds and explosive jumps — the sort of numbers that turn a positional projection into a fringe first-round conversation. (NFL.com)
  • Conversely, Davison Igbinosun (Ohio State, CB) disappointed in quickness measures and change-of-direction, with a 10-yard split and vertical that left evaluators uneasy about his twitch and hip fluidity. (NFL.com)
  • Max Klare (Ohio State, TE) elected not to run or jump, a decision that puts more burden on his pro day to show athletic upside after a season of lower volume. (NFL.com)
  • The safety room was deep; Emmanuel McNeil-Warren’s testing was fine but buried by multiple elite showings — a reminder that a solid workout alone sometimes isn’t enough in a stacked group. (NFL.com)

Players who boosted their stock

  • Daylen Everette (Georgia, CB)
    • Why it matters: Size + speed + ball skills. Even if 2025 tape wasn’t elite, the combine provided measurable upside that teams can project into coverage roles and special teams. A true jump in perceived upside.
  • Kenyon Sadiq (Oregon, TE)
    • Why it matters: Rare athletic profile for a true Y/T tight end. At 241 pounds with sub-4.4 speed and elite jumping traits, he checks boxes teams love for mismatches and vertical threats.
  • John Michael Gyllenborg (Wyoming, TE)
    • Why it matters: Measured well and displayed athleticism after a 2025 season hampered by injury — good combine + prior tape = a clearer path into Day 2/Day 1 considerations.

(Notes: Other outlets echoed these risers and flagged more CBs and TEs who stood out; strong performances from guys such as Treydan Stukes and Tacario Davis were also highlighted around the web.) (nfl.com)

Players who took a step back

  • Davison Igbinosun (Ohio State, CB)
    • The problem: Stiff hips, a 10-yard split and vertical that didn’t sell starter-level quickness. That combination can flatten an inside/outside projection for Day 2 teams. (nfl.com)
  • Max Klare (Ohio State, TE)
    • The problem: Not testing at the combine hands the narrative control back to teams — and in a deep TE class, missing measurable chances to separate is costly. (nfl.com)
  • Emmanuel McNeil-Warren (Toledo, S)
    • The problem: Solid testing but overshadowed by elite numbers from several safeties; the result is a plateau rather than a springboard. (nfl.com)

How teams will likely react

  • For bigger boards (top-64), measurable athleticism still rules the margins. A player like Sadiq suddenly has first-round buzz because he offers mismatch traits that modern offenses covet.
  • For corners and safeties, scheme fit matters. Teams will weigh hip fluidity and short-area quickness more heavily than dash times alone — but poor short-area testing can still knock a player down boards.
  • Players who skipped events (like Klare) will be triaged: teams will either bet on tape and medicals or wait for pro-day verification. That uncertainty often pushes a player's value down in the pre-draft market.

What to watch next

  • Pro days: Players who didn’t test fully or underwhelmed will get a last chance at their schools. How many will hit new heights on turf they know?
  • Positional comparables: As scouts stack TEs and DBs side-by-side, look at route versatility, contested-catch ability and film on third-down reps — combine numbers are context, not destiny.
  • Team-specific needs: A borderline prospect can leap into Day 2 if a team with scheme alignment believes the testing matches their plan.

My take

The combine remains a noisy but useful market signal. Day 2’s winners were the players whose testing reinforced a believable NFL role: size, burst and clean hands for TEs; size, speed and explosiveness for DBs. But film still matters. If a prospect runs fast but can’t flip his hips in coverage, teams will downgrade him; if a player posts eye-popping numbers but lacks tape, expect conservative, upside-themed drafting.

In short: Day 2 created compelling narratives — some will hold, some will be revised at pro days and in private visits. For draft-watchers, the best strategy is to let the combine refine — not overwrite — what the tape already told you.

Final thoughts

The combine is where certainty is smoothed into probability. A single 40 time or vertical jump won’t determine a career, but it can change the odds. For prospects like Everette and Sadiq, Friday gave them momentum to carry to team meetings and interviews. For others, it set a clearer, humbler path forward. The next month of pro days and interviews will tell us how many of these movements were seismic and how many were just noise.

Sources




Related update: We recently published an article that expands on this topic: read the latest post.


Related update: We recently published an article that expands on this topic: read the latest post.

Mike Borgonzi: If you have a chance to draft a franchise QB, you don’t pass on him – NBC Sports | Analysis by Brian Moineau

Mike Borgonzi: If you have a chance to draft a franchise QB, you don’t pass on him - NBC Sports | Analysis by Brian Moineau

Title: The Quarterback Conundrum: Titans' Temptation and the Franchise Fantasy

In the world of professional sports, where every decision can swing the pendulum between triumph and disaster, the importance of selecting the right quarterback cannot be overstated. Recently, Mike Borgonzi, a seasoned NFL executive, emphasized a timeless truth in football: "If you have a chance to draft a franchise QB, you don’t pass on him." This sentiment reverberates throughout the league, as teams constantly search for the elusive cornerstone that can transform their fortunes.

The Tennessee Titans, a team with a storied past yet a challenging present, have been spotted at Cam Ward's Pro Day. For those not in the know, Pro Days are like job interviews on steroids for college football players. Cam Ward, a promising young quarterback, has caught the attention of several NFL teams. His performance and potential could very well align with Borgonzi's philosophy. But is Ward the key to the Titans' future dominance?

The Titans' attendance at Ward's showcase is an intriguing move, especially considering their current quarterback situation. With Ryan Tannehill as the incumbent starter and Malik Willis waiting in the wings, the Titans are not devoid of options. However, as we've seen with teams like the Kansas City Chiefs and Patrick Mahomes or the Cincinnati Bengals and Joe Burrow, a franchise quarterback can redefine a team's identity and trajectory.

Ward's collegiate career has been noteworthy, characterized by impressive stats and an on-field charisma that scouts find hard to ignore. His ability to extend plays and maintain composure under pressure are traits that any team would covet. Yet, the transition from college to the NFL is fraught with challenges, and the Titans must weigh the immediate need versus long-term potential.

Outside the realm of football, the concept of identifying and nurturing talent is universal. In business, much like in sports, companies seek visionary leaders who can steer the ship through turbulent waters. The tech industry, for instance, is rife with stories of young prodigies who have reshaped the digital landscape. Similarly, in the arts, a rising star can captivate audiences and redefine genres. The pursuit of a franchise QB mirrors these quests for transformative figures across various fields.

Furthermore, the Titans' interest in Ward can be seen through a broader lens of change and adaptation. As industries worldwide grapple with rapid technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences, adaptability becomes key. The NFL is no different. Teams must adapt to new playing styles, innovative strategies, and emerging talents. In this light, scouting Cam Ward is not merely about filling a roster spot but about evolving with the times.

In conclusion, while Borgonzi's assertion underscores the perennial importance of the quarterback position, the Titans' potential pursuit of Cam Ward is emblematic of a broader narrative. It's about seizing opportunities, embracing change, and daring to dream. As the Titans ponder their next move, they're not just considering a player but contemplating a future. Whether Ward becomes the next great NFL quarterback remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the Titans are poised at a crossroads, and their decision could echo through the NFL for years to come.

Read more about AI in Business

Read more about Latest Sports Trends

Read more about Technology Innovations