Upset at the PMAC: LSU Topples No. 2 Texas, 70–65

The Pete Maravich Assembly Center was electric — sold out, loud and pulsing with that particular kind of belief that only a packed college arena can generate. On January 11, 2026, LSU’s women’s basketball team fed off that energy and delivered a signature victory: a 70–65 win over No. 2 Texas. It wasn’t a blowout highlight reel, but a gritty, full-team performance that felt like the kind of game that can define a season.

Why this mattered

• Beating a top-two team at home changes perception. LSU’s 70–65 victory over an 18–0 Texas squad isn’t just one in the win column — it’s a statement that LSU can compete with the nation’s elite.
• Momentum and confidence are contagious. LSU had stumbled recently; this win provides a reset and shows resilience under Kim Mulkey’s leadership.
• The SEC shook a little bit. Texas remains a program to respect, but conference standings and March narratives are subtly different after a home upset like this.

The game in moments

• Slow first quarter, competitive first half: The teams traded baskets early and the first quarter ended tied 11–11. LSU closed the half with a buzzer-beater by Jada Richard to carry a five-point lead (30–25) into halftime. (LSU finished the half shooting 12-of-31.)
• Second-half toughness: LSU stretched its lead in the third and managed the Longhorns’ late rally in the fourth. Texas chipped away — including a 13–3 run that put the pressure on — but LSU hit the critical plays down the stretch to hold on.
• Paint and boards won it: LSU’s ability to rebound and convert inside proved decisive. The Tigers won the rebounding battle and limited Texas’s second-chance opportunities at key moments.
• Standouts: Mikaylah Williams led LSU with 20 points on 7-of-13 shooting and two 3s. For Texas, Madison Booker poured in 24 points (10-of-16), and Kyla Oldacre posted a 16/16 double-double in a losing effort.

Takeaways for fans and followers

• This was a full-team effort, not a one-player miracle. Multiple Tigers contributed double-figure scoring and timely defense.
• LSU’s home-court energy is real. A sold-out PMAC was a tangible advantage and the Tigers used it to control momentum at crucial stretches.
• Texas remains a top program — their late surge showed why they’re ranked — but LSU exposed vulnerabilities and earned a resume-boosting win that will matter on selection Sunday and in the polls.

Impact on both teams

• LSU: The win moves the Tigers to 16–2 and restores confidence after a couple of SEC stumbles. It validates Kim Mulkey’s message about toughness and should galvanize the roster for the stretch run.
• Texas: Falling to 18–1 halts an undefeated run and answers some questions about how the Longhorns respond to adversity away from home. They still have depth, star scoring and an elite resume, but this loss will give opponents hope and scouting material.

My take

Upsets like this boil down to more than X’s and O’s — they’re about identity and belief. LSU didn’t just outscore Texas; they played with a renewed edge and grabbed extra possessions when it mattered. That kind of win can be transformative, especially in a league as deep and competitive as the SEC. If LSU builds on this and tightens a few loose moments, they’ve shown they can be a dangerous team in March. And for Texas, the loss is a reminder that dominant records bring targets — and the best teams respond by learning fast.

Sources

• LSU Athletics — "LSU Takes Down Texas, 70-65" (January 11, 2026).
  https://lsusports.net/news/2026/01/11/lsu-takes-down-texas-70-65/
• University of Texas Athletics — "No. 2 Women's Basketball falls at No. 12 LSU, 70-65" (January 11, 2026).
  https://texaslonghorns.com/news/2026/1/11/no-2-womens-basketball-falls-at-no-12-lsu-70-65
• Burnt Orange Nation — "No. 2 Texas comes up short against No. 12 LSU, 70-65" (game recap).
  https://www.burntorangenation.com/texas-longhorns-womens-basketball/99896/texas-longhorns-65-lsu-tigers-70
• Louisiana Radio Network — "LSU Lady Tigers beat No. 2 Texas, 70-65" (January 12, 2026).
  https://louisianaradionetwork.com/2026/01/12/45002/

Chaos, Comebacks, and Championship Breath-Holders

An AP-style projected Top 25 after a wild weekend of rivalry upsets, Iron Bowl drama, and a Big Ten statement.

College football served another reminder: we’re in the thick of the season where rivalries, momentum swings, and one-off performances can rewrite the playoff conversation overnight. Alabama survived a late scare in the Iron Bowl, Texas stunned Texas A&M to hand the Aggies their first loss, and Ohio State’s blowout of Michigan made a loud case for playoff positioning. Here’s a digestible look at what matters, why it matters, and how the projected AP Top 25 shifts because of it.

Weekend highlights that actually changed the map

• Alabama edged Auburn in a tense Iron Bowl that left more questions than answers for both teams — Alabama’s résumé remains strong but the Scarlet Tide didn’t exactly reassure skeptics.
• Texas beat Texas A&M, handing the Aggies their first loss and knocking A&M down the rankings — the Longhorns reinsert themselves as spoilers in the SEC picture.
• Ohio State rolled Michigan in a performance that reinforced its No. 1 credentials and likely tightened the committee’s trust heading into conference title weekend.
• Across the country, other results shuffled teams around the bubble and the Power 5 pecking order, making this the kind of late-November weekend the AP poll voters live for.

Why these results matter more than a single Saturday score

• Rivalry games carry outsized weight — beating a top rival affects a team’s résumé, perception, and regional momentum in ways a neutral win doesn’t. Texas beating A&M not only dropped the Aggies in the standings but also altered who gets a clear path to the SEC title and the narrative around A&M’s November mettle.
• Alabama’s Iron Bowl scare exposes vulnerability. Close wins against good opponents keep you in the Top 10, but they don’t build the kind of résumé the playoff committee sews up late in the season. If Alabama’s win looked shaky, it invites skepticism when compared to dominant conference leaders.
• Ohio State’s blowout of Michigan isn’t just style points — it’s a statement. A dominant rivalry win boosts perceived strength of schedule and shows readiness for one-and-done playoff scenarios.

What moved in the projected AP Top 25 (themes, not a full list)

• Teams that won their rivalry and conference-deciding games mostly climbed or held steady.
• Texas A&M fell after its first loss; Texas rose and reentered critical conversation as an upset-capable team.
• Ohio State’s performance consolidated its spot at or near the top of the poll.
• Alabama remains a top-10 team but its mortal vulnerabilities mean voters are more likely to slot it below undefeated conference frontrunners.
• Several one-loss or late-blooming squads (including Group of Five leaders) nudged into the conversation thanks to big signature wins elsewhere.

Snapshot: who benefits and who’s hurt

• Benefit: Ohio State — a clinical win over Michigan cements trust.
• Benefit: Texas — a rivalry victory that flips a season narrative and sinks a rival.
• Hurt: Texas A&M — first loss means tumble and fewer “safe” votes.
• Hurt (perception-wise): Alabama — wins, yes, but not the kind that quiets playoff skeptics.

The bigger picture: conference races and playoff implications

• The Big Ten title game and SEC shuffle are now even more consequential: an Ohio State win would likely leave it at the top or very close to it; an Alabama hiccup and A&M’s tumble make the SEC landscape messy and open for a team with a strong late resume to seize a slot.
• Voters and the committee aren’t just tracking wins — they care about how teams win. Dominant performances vs. nail-biters will be processed differently in early December.
• For bubble teams and Group of Five contenders, conference championships and signature matchups are now must-win moments to avoid being passed over.

Conversation starters for fans and voters

• Does a narrow Iron Bowl win against a good Auburn team still deserve top-10 placement?
• How much should one rivalry loss (Texas A&M) impact a team’s final ranking, especially if their overall résumé is otherwise strong?
• Are voters valuing Ohio State’s blowout differently because it came against an arch-rival, and should they?

My take

College football’s late season always rewards drama. This weekend’s results didn’t produce a single, clean narrative — they produced competing storylines. Ohio State looked like a juggernaut; Texas rewrote its rivalry history for the year; Alabama and A&M reminded us both are vulnerable. The AP Top 25 — and the College Football Playoff committee — now have to balance outcomes, quality of wins, and how teams performed under pressure. Expect the rankings to remain fluid through conference title weekend.

Parting thought

When rivalry weekends produce upsets and uneasy victories, the polls follow the storylines not just the box scores. That’s what makes late-November college football equal parts maddening and magnificent — every game can tilt the national conversation.

Sources

• AP News — "Georgia up to No. 3 behind Ohio State, Indiana in Top 25 shuffle as Oregon, Texas Tech also climb"
  https://apnews.com/article/c8bf8a91d8168f000d5ddf0e121b3a41

• Reuters — "Georgia is new No. 3 behind Ohio State, Indiana in AP Top 25"
  https://www.reuters.com/sports/georgia-is-new-no-3-behind-ohio-state-indiana-ap-top-25–flm-2025-11-30/

• Houston Chronicle — "Texas A&M drops to No. 7 in AP college football rankings; Texas Tech moves up to No. 5"
  https://www.houstonchronicle.com/sports/college/article/ap-football-rankings-tamu-texas-tech-longhorns-21215206.php