“Crosby is available, at the right price” — what the Raiders’ steep asking price really means

Introduction hook

You don’t ask for two first-round picks and a player unless you’re trying to change the timeline of a franchise. When the Las Vegas Raiders reportedly told the league they’d only move Maxx Crosby for “two first-round picks and a player,” the sports world did that rare thing: it paused, re-routed conversations, and started imagining blockbuster scenarios. This isn’t just trade chatter — it’s a statement about value, identity and how teams decide between today’s best edge rusher and the uncertain currency of draft capital.

Why the demand is headline-worthy

• Maxx Crosby is not just a good player. He’s a franchise-defining edge rusher — multi-time Pro Bowler, game-wrecker, and the kind of disruptive force that can flip playoff games.
• But asking for a package on the scale of what the Cowboys received for Micah Parsons (two first-rounders plus a player) is aggressive. It signals that the Raiders view Crosby as an asset worth anchoring a rebuild or accelerating a contender — not a role player you move for mid-round picks.
• The timing is notable: Las Vegas holds the top pick in the 2026 draft and looks poised to draft a rookie quarterback to reset the franchise timeline. Moving Crosby would be a clear pivot toward a multiyear rebuild with draft capital as the currency.

Context and relevant background

• Crosby signed a big extension in 2025 and has remained an elite pass rusher through the 2025 season. Yet the Raiders’ 2025 campaign fell apart; internal friction (including Crosby leaving the facility after being told he wouldn’t play late in the season) was widely reported and raised the specter of an uneasy split. (nbcsports.com)
• The precedent matters: the Packers–Cowboys–Parsons/Kenny Clark trade set a recent market benchmark for elite edge rushers. That deal involved two first-round picks plus a starting defensive lineman, and teams around the league are using it as a template. The Raiders’ price mirrors that template. (nbcsports.com)
• Media and analytic outlets have started producing mock trades and lists of suitors (49ers, Bills, etc.), showing there’s real marketplace interest — but also serious complications like salary-cap math and what “a player” actually looks like in a package. (si.com)

What the asking price actually buys Las Vegas

• Two first-round picks: draft capital lets the Raiders either (a) restock talent over multiple positions, (b) trade back for roster depth, or (c) acquire young, cost-controlled starters to pair with a rookie QB. High picks = flexibility.
• A player in the return package: that’s the immediate plug-and-play piece — someone who can replace snaps or contribute right away. For a defense, this is typically a starting DL, LB, or complementary edge who can ease the loss of Crosby’s production.
• In sum: Las Vegas would be exchanging a short-term superstar for a blended pathway back to sustained competitiveness — a classic “win-now” player swapped for long-term optionality.

How contenders and rebuilders should think about this

• Contenders with a short window (Buffalo, 49ers, Cowboys-style teams) might justify giving up premium picks if they view Crosby as the missing piece to reach — and win — a Super Bowl. The calculus: guaranteed elite pass rush now vs. gambled future talent.
• Rebuilders should sniff for picks, not players. If a team is four-plus years away from competing, taking the draft capital and flipping it into more picks or young talent is better than mortgaging the future for a veteran.
• Salary-cap and contract length matter. Crosby’s extension matters to any acquiring team: paying elite money for a 28–29-year-old rusher changes the calculus on how many picks or players teams are willing to include. (nbcsports.com)

Risks and counterarguments

• Age and wear: Crosby is in his late 20s. Elite pass rushers can remain dominant into their 30s, but injuries and diminishing returns are a real risk.
• Changing team dynamics: Trading away a cultural leader and face of the defense can destabilize a locker room — even for a rebuild. Crosby’s footprint in Las Vegas isn’t just statistical; it’s identity.
• Overpaying based on narrative: The Parsons trade set expectations. But Parsons was younger at the time of that deal and carried a different profile. Some insiders (e.g., Ian Rapoport) have warned that Crosby’s market might not match Parsons’ exactly. (raidersbeat.com)

Possible landing spots and what they’d owe

• San Francisco: A natural fit defensively; they’ve been floated in multiple mock trades and could offer a combination of picks and role players. But their picks are late in Round 1, changing the value calculus. (si.com)
• Buffalo: Has the playoff window and might be willing to sacrifice picks and a player to add an immediate game-wrecker for Josh Allen. Cap room and roster construction could complicate the deal. (cbssports.com)
• Other contenders (teams like Detroit, Dallas-style suitors) could also be in the mix depending on how aggressive they want to be and what they can move without gutting depth.

Practical red lines for the Raiders

• Don’t accept just quantity of picks — quality matters. Two late firsts are not the same as two early ones.
• The “player” must be a starting-caliber contributor, or the Raiders should remain resolute and let Crosby walk if the market is insufficient.
• If the franchise plans to draft a franchise QB with the No. 1 pick, any trade must leave the roster competent enough to give that QB a chance to develop; trading every veteran piece for picks would be self-defeating.

A few scenarios that make sense

• Championship push: A contender gives two early firsts + starting DL — Raiders say yes to accelerate contention.
• Balanced rebuild: Two mid/late firsts + a young starting-caliber player + a future pick swap — Raiders negotiate, keep cap flexibility, and restock.
• No fair offer: Raiders keep Crosby, ride with him and the top draft pick — accept that a core veteran-plus-rookie rebuild can be compelling if managed well.

My take

Maxx Crosby is a rare commodity, but the Raiders’ asking price is as much a narrative plaster as it is a negotiating stance. By demanding two first-round picks and a player, Las Vegas is protecting its ability to reshape its roster while signaling that it won’t settle for pennies on the dollar for one of the league’s premier pass rushers. Teams should pay attention: a deal could reshape multiple rosters this spring, but it will require the right mix of draft capital, a reliable immediate contributor, and the willingness to absorb a significant contract.

Final thoughts

Trades like this are chess, not checkers. Crosby’s availability — “at the right price” — gives contenders a chance to flip a calculus and rebuilders a shot at reloading. Whether the Raiders get their exact asking price or a negotiated variant, the discussion alone highlights how much teams now value elite edge disruption. Expect heavy phone traffic, creative offers, and a price discovery process that will occupy the next few weeks of the offseason.

Sources

• Raiders want two first-round picks and a player for Maxx Crosby — NBC Sports.
  https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/raiders-want-two-first-round-picks-and-a-player-for-maxx-crosby. (nbcsports.com)

• Source: LV wants two firsts and player for Crosby — NBC Sports (video segment).
  https://www.nbcsports.com/watch/nfl/profootballtalk/source-raiders-want-two-1st-round-picks-and-a-player-for-crosby. (nbcsports.com)

• The Raiders' steep asking price in Maxx Crosby trade revealed — New York Post.
  https://nypost.com/2026/02/26/sports/the-raiders-steep-asking-price-in-maxx-crosby-trade-revealed/. (nypost.com)

• The 49ers Could Make an Aggressive Trade Offer for Maxx Crosby — Sports Illustrated.
  https://www.si.com/nfl/49ers/onsi/news/49ers-could-make-aggressive-trade-offer-maxx-crosby. (si.com)

• Maxx Crosby trade rumors: Five mock trades Raiders could consider — CBS Sports.
  https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/maxx-crosby-trade-rumors-mock-trades-raiders/. (cbssports.com)

• Rapoport Disputes Glazer’s Estimate on Maxx Crosby’s Trade Value — Raiders Beat.
  https://www.raidersbeat.com/report-disputes-maxx-crosbys-trade-value/. (raidersbeat.com)

• Fox Sports coverage of Jay Glazer’s reporting on Maxx Crosby trade rumors.
  https://www.foxsports.com/stories/nfl/jay-glazer-maxx-crosby-raiders-trade-rumors. (foxsports.com)

Closing the Year with Purpose: The Cowboys’ Unexpected Summer of Hope

There’s a particular kind of stubborn optimism in football — the kind that refuses to let the season end quietly even when the playoffs are out of reach. After the Dallas Cowboys were officially eliminated from playoff contention in late December 2025, head coach Brian Schottenheimer didn’t send the veterans home early or pivot fully into audition mode. Instead he doubled down on one message: they’re still building something special.

This is not the self-delusion of an owner desperate for headlines or a coach covering for mistakes. It’s a deliberate cultural stance, a claim about identity and process when the scoreboard stings the most.

Why Schottenheimer’s stance matters

• It reframes the end of a disappointing season as an investment period rather than an admission of failure.
• The approach protects the delicate balance between player development, veteran stewardship, and organizational continuity.
• It gives the franchise a narrative heading into 2026: learning, accountability, and sustained standards.

Schottenheimer has been clear: this is year one of a project. That matters for teams that want to avoid the “blow-it-up” cycle and instead create long-term winning habits.

What Schottenheimer actually said

• He emphasized the immediate focus — “playing the Commanders” and taking each game seriously.
• He stressed that players still want to play, want to win, and care about one another.
• He framed culture as intact: practice effort, locker-room cohesion and accountability remain, even if the win-loss column doesn’t show it yet.
• He acknowledged coaching and execution need fixing, calling out that the record shows “we’re not playing good enough football” and “I’m not coaching good enough football,” while insisting culture is not the problem. (DallasCowboys.com)

This mix of accountability and faith in the locker room is a classic leadership posture — own the failures, but insist on the foundations that will allow you to fix them.

The practical choices behind the rhetoric

• Managing veterans: Schottenheimer signaled cautious handling of veteran stars (like Dak Prescott) when games get out of hand, balancing player health with momentum-building.
• Division focus: He pointed out the realistic chance to “go potentially 5‑1 in the division,” reframing the remaining slate into a tangible target that matters to fans and players.
• Play and practice standards: He highlighted that the team continues to practice and prepare hard — the kind of consistency that helps teams rebound faster in Year Two.

These are not poetic platitudes — they’re operational decisions that shape roster usage, coaching priorities in the offseason, and how the front office evaluates progress.

The broader context

• This was Schottenheimer’s first year as head coach, a season with notable roster moves and upheavals (including high-profile trades earlier in 2025) and uneven results on defense and offense.
• Owner Jerry Jones has been publicly intent on “competing now,” which adds pressure to turn culture into wins quickly.
• Despite the misses, Dallas still landed notable individual recognition (e.g., Pro Bowl nods), underscoring that talent exists even if synergy didn’t consistently follow.

Taken together, the season reads like a classic transitional campaign: flashes of high-level play, recurrent structural issues (especially on defense), and a coach trying to install a long-term identity while under immediate-results pressure.

Nuggets for fans and skeptics

• This stance isn’t an excuse: Schottenheimer explicitly took coaching responsibility where due. That kind of candor can buy credibility if next season shows measurable improvement.
• Culture alone won’t win games. The Cowboys will need tangible fixes — schematics, personnel, situational coaching — to translate the “special” rhetoric into wins.
• The remaining games of the 2025 season were being framed as momentum-building opportunities, not consolation prizes. That matters when evaluating offseason momentum and front-office decisions.

What to watch in 2026

• Coaching adjustments: Will Schottenheimer change his staff or scheme emphases to stop the defensive slide?
• Roster moves: Will the front office prioritize pass rush and secondary help to address persistent defensive shortcomings?
• Player development: Can young and new pieces (and veteran leaders) convert late-season effort into early-season cohesion next year?

If the organization truly believes this is a sustainable build, those are the levers they’ll pull.

A short verdict

You can be skeptical — and you should be. “We’re building something special” is a bold claim from a first-year coach whose team missed the postseason. But there’s credibility in Schottenheimer’s blend of ownership and optimism: he admitted coaching shortcomings, praised the locker-room culture, and set practical goals for the remaining games. If Dallas converts that cultural bedrock into clearer strategic fixes (especially on defense), the phrase won’t sound like wishful thinking next fall.

Final thoughts

Good culture is necessary and messy stuff is inevitable. The true test for the Cowboys will be whether the lessons of 2025 produce measurable change in 2026. Fans don’t just want hope — they want progress. For now, Schottenheimer has given the locker room a direction and the franchise a baseline: finish strong, protect the core, and turn culture into consistent execution. That’s a start worth watching.

Sources

• Brian Schottenheimer, Cowboys aiming to close 2025 strong: 'We're building something special' — Dallas Cowboys.
  https://www.dallascowboys.com/news/brian-schottenheimer-cowboys-aiming-to-close-2025-strong-we-re-building-something-special

• Brian Schottenheimer believes Cowboys can still compete for Super Bowl after trading Micah Parsons — NFL.com.
  https://www.nfl.com/news/brian-schottenheimer-believes-cowboys-can-still-compete-for-super-bowl-after-trading-micah-parsons

When a Season Tilts: DaRon Bland, the Cowboys’ Corner, and the Fragility of Momentum

A gut-punch moment for Cowboys fans: DaRon Bland — the All-Pro corner who altered games with his ball-hawking instincts — is now a realistic injured‑reserve candidate because of a foot issue that surfaced during preparations for the Week 16 matchup against the Los Angeles Chargers. That single sentence carries ripple effects for Dallas’s defense, roster decisions and the feel of the locker room the rest of the way.

Quick hits you should know

• DaRon Bland was added to the Cowboys’ practice/injury reports Dec. 18, 2025, after a foot problem that sidelined him during midweek practice and made him unlikely to play Sunday versus the Chargers. (dallascowboys.com)
• The team signaled the injury could be serious enough to require placing Bland on season‑ending injured reserve, which would end his 2025 campaign with three games remaining. (dallascowboys.com)
• Bland’s availability has been a recurring storyline since 2024, when a foot stress fracture forced him to miss significant time; durability is becoming a concern for a player on a big contract and with All‑Pro pedigree. (dallasnews.com)

The context: why this matters beyond one roster move

Bland is not just “a corner” for the Cowboys — he’s a playmaker with a history of flipping field position and generating turnovers. In 2023 he exploded onto the national radar, leading the league with nine interceptions and returning an unprecedented five for touchdowns. The Cowboys leaned on that playmaking ability as a cornerstone of their secondary identity.

When a player like Bland becomes unavailable late in the season, several things happen at once:

• Opposing offenses adjust, targeting the side away from the team’s most disruptive defender. That can force the Cowboys to rotate coverages more or rely on less‑proven teammates.
• The coaching staff suddenly faces pressure to retool matchups and potentially increase Trevon Diggs’ snaps (if/when he’s available), or to accelerate the development of younger corners. Reports indicate the Cowboys were already juggling Diggs’ status and other cornerback windows. (dallascowboys.com)
• The front office and medical staff must balance short‑term competitiveness against long‑term health. Putting Bland on IR could protect his recovery and the team’s future investment, but it also concedes immediate defensive continuity.

What the roster implications look like

• If Bland lands on injured reserve: Dallas must hollow out a starting-caliber role across the secondary for the remaining three games, or shuffle Diggs and backups into heavier duty. The team has options — returning players from the practice squad window, flipping nickel personnel, or leaning on coverage schematics that mask inexperience — but none are perfect substitutes for an All‑Pro. (dallascowboys.com)
• If Bland avoids IR and misses only a few games: the Cowboys preserve a matchup advantage for the playoffs (in a healthy scenario), but risk aggravating the injury and possible surgery/longer absence later. Given Bland’s recent foot history, conservative management is a rational path. (dallasnews.com)

What this means for the Chargers game — and the rest of the month

Even if Bland is inactive Sunday, the Cowboys can still defend well on schematic strength and pass rush. Still, his absence compresses margin for error: coverages that rely on tight single‑coverage outside could be more vulnerable, and Dallas may have to trust inexperienced alignments in crucial moments.

For the Chargers game specifically, expect the Cowboys to:

• Mix zone and help over the top to keep receivers away from the sideline where young corners can get isolated.
• Increase safety rotation and safety‑to‑slot matchups to account for mismatches.
• Consider elevating practice‑squad or depth corners to provide fresh legs and special‑teams value.

My take

It’s disappointing on a human level — no player wants to see a season end in a quiet medical room rather than the bright lights of a game. For the Cowboys, this moment reveals two hard truths: elite playmakers are also fragile, and a good roster is built not only with stars but with dependable depth plans. I’d rather see the team make the prudent medical call even if it costs the next three games. Protecting Bland’s long‑term health preserves the investment and gives Dallas a chance to start 2026 with one of its best defenders healthy.

Final thoughts

Injuries are the cruel equalizer of the NFL. The way Dallas responds — schematically and in roster moves — will show whether the organization learned from past seasons about building sustainable depth. Fans should brace for a few imperfect weeks, but also remember that smart, measured decisions now could be the difference between a recovered All‑Pro next fall and a chronic problem that lingers beyond one campaign.

Sources

• DaRon Bland becomes IR candidate due to foot injury — Dallas Cowboys. https://www.dallascowboys.com/news/daron-bland-becomes-ir-candidate-due-to-foot-injury. (dallascowboys.com)
• Cowboys CB DaRon Bland may need season‑ending foot surgery — The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/sports/cowboys/2025/12/18/dallas-cowboys-cb-daron-bland-foot-surgery-season-ending-injury/. (dallasnews.com)

How a Late-August Trade Echoed All Season Long

The Cowboys lost in Detroit on a Thursday night and suddenly playoff math felt brutal. But if you peel back the immediate mistakes and misfortunes — fumbles, a concussion to CeeDee Lamb, an ugly defensive night — there’s a single, avoidable pivot that shaped Dallas’s 2025 arc: the Micah Parsons trade. That move didn’t just change a roster; it rewired a defensive plan, forced tactical improvisation, and turned a Week 4 overtime tie into a season-long scar.

Why one tie matters more than it should

• Week 4: Cowboys vs. Packers ended 40–40 in overtime. Micah Parsons, traded to Green Bay just before the season, sacked Dak Prescott in overtime at the goal line. That play ended a drive that could’ve produced a Cowboys win and instead produced a tie. A single half-win became half a loss in the standings.
• Fast-forward to December: Dallas sits on the knife edge of the wild-card chase. That Week 4 tie — and the lost chance to convert it into a win — looms because margins in the NFC were razor-thin. A win there would have changed seedings, tiebreakers and the feel of late-season matchups.

The Sports Illustrated piece that sparked this post frames the trade as the turning point: Detroit may have delivered the final blow, but Jerry Jones’s decision to move Parsons set the Cowboys back months before the Lions ever took the field. (si.com)

The tactical ripple: scheme, pressure and personnel

• Micah Parsons wasn’t just a pass rusher; he was the fulcrum of the defensive game plan Matt Eberflus had been installing. When Dallas sent Parsons to Green Bay, Eberflus had to rethink pressure packages and cover responsibilities on the fly.
• Dallas tried to plug the hole with later trades — adding Quinnen Williams and Logan Wilson — but those reinforcements arrived after several early losses and a 3–5–1 stretch that left the Cowboys scrambling. The defense improved with the additions, but the deficit had already been built. (inkl.com)
• The Packers game is a neat microcosm: Parsons’s presence in Green Bay’s scheme allowed him to impact that overtime drive directly. That single sack in OT stands out as a tangible moment where the trade changed an outcome. The Packers’ own writeup of the Week 4 matchup highlights Parsons’ return-to-Dallas narrative and his late pressures. (packers.com)

The human element: timing, leverage and clubhouse dynamics

Trades don’t happen in a vacuum. The Parsons saga involved contract negotiations, public friction, and optics that mattered inside the locker room. Dallas’ leadership chose a path — prioritize long-term flexibility and move a star — and the timing (weeks before the opener) compounded the fallout.

• A star departing days before the season forces schematic changes in real time.
• A defense built around one player must either reinvent itself or suffer early growing pains.
• Even when new pieces arrive, they need time to integrate; Dallas’ midseason reinforcements helped but couldn’t erase the lost ground. (profootballrumors.com)

What the box score doesn’t show

• The Parsons trade’s real damage wasn’t just the stat sheet when examining that one sack. It was the lost continuity — game plans practiced with Parsons in mind, instincts tuned to his blitzes and containments that no longer existed.
• Every defensive call thereafter had to account for absence: fewer obvious rushers, altered blitz timing, and more pressure on the secondary. Those intangible changes yielded points against Dallas in games that, in a different world, might have been wins.

Near-term implications and path forward

• Dallas still has talent and, with four games left, could mount a late run. But the margin for error is small and the NFC is deep.
• The franchise faces questions about decision-making cadence: trade timing, negotiating posture with stars, and whether midseason fixes can realistically erase early-season strategic deficits.
• If the Cowboys want to avoid similar self-inflicted wounds, patience and clearer internal communication in contract talks might be as important as the next trade. Sports franchises win and lose on the margins — and on the choices made when time is short. (si.com)

Quick points to remember

• The Week 4 tie vs. Green Bay (40–40) was pivotal; Parsons’ OT sack ended a potential game-winning drive for Dallas. (packers.com)
• Trading Parsons weeks before the opener forced schematic changes that left Dallas vulnerable early in the year. (si.com)
• Midseason additions (Quinnen Williams, Logan Wilson) helped, but they arrived too late to fully reverse the early damage. (inkl.com)

Final thoughts

Fans love neat narratives — the Lions knocked the Cowboys out, or Jerry Jones made the wrong move. Reality is messier: the Parsons trade wasn’t a single act that destroyed a season, but it was a strategic choice whose timing amplified other problems. When a season is decided by a few plays, those early choices matter more than headlines suggest. For Dallas, this year should be a lesson that roster moves are chess pieces, not quick fixes, and that the cost of haste can be measured in ties that become the difference between contention and collapse.

Sources

• Micah Parsons Trade, Not the Lions, Cost the Cowboys Their Season — Sports Illustrated.
  https://www.si.com/nfl/micah-parsons-trade-not-the-lions-cost-the-cowboys-their-season. (si.com)

• Packers play to a 40-40 tie in Dallas, game recap — Green Bay Packers (team site).
  https://www.packers.com/news/game-recap-5-takeaways-from-packers-overtime-tie-with-cowboys-week-4-2025. (packers.com)

• Micah Parsons 'pissed off' after Packers defense gives up 40 points to Cowboys in tie — NFL.com.
  https://www.nfl.com/news/micah-parsons-on-packers-defense-allowing-40-points-to-cowboys-in-week-4-tie. (nfl.com)

• Cowboys midseason moves and analysis, trade context — Pro Football Rumors (background on trade/contract context).
  https://www.profootballrumors.com/players/micah-parsons. (profootballrumors.com)

Bigger Changes on the Horizon for the Dallas Cowboys After Bye Week

The Dallas Cowboys are no strangers to the spotlight, but the recent loss against the Denver Broncos has ignited a firestorm of questions and concerns. As the team sits at a disappointing 3-4-1, offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer has hinted that “bigger changes” are coming after the bye week. Let’s dive into what this means for the Cowboys and what fans can expect moving forward.

Context: A Season of Ups and Downs

The Cowboys started this season with high hopes, bolstered by a roster filled with talent and potential. However, inconsistencies have plagued the team, leading to a lackluster record. Their most recent outing against the Broncos was particularly disheartening, as they suffered a significant defeat that left fans and analysts alike questioning the team’s direction.

In the wake of this loss, Schottenheimer’s comments suggest that the coaching staff is ready to shake things up. With the NFL season now at its midway point, teams are often reassessing their strategies and tactics, especially when results aren’t aligning with expectations.

Key Takeaways

– Coaching Changes on the Table: Brian Schottenheimer has indicated that the Cowboys will implement noticeable changes, which could include alterations in play-calling or adjustments to player roles.

– Offensive Struggles: The Cowboys’ offense has struggled to find its rhythm, and Schottenheimer’s remarks suggest that they may be looking to revamp their approach to scoring and game management.

– Player Performance Review: There may be a shift in personnel as the coaching staff evaluates which players are best suited for the team’s evolving strategy.

– Bye Week as a Reset: The upcoming bye week provides a crucial opportunity for the Cowboys to regroup, analyze their season so far, and make the necessary adjustments without the pressure of an immediate game.

– Fan Expectations: With a passionate fanbase eager for success, the Cowboys’ management will need to not only address the on-field issues but also restore faith among their supporters.

A Time for Reflection

As the Cowboys look ahead to the rest of the season, it’s clear that changes are needed to get back on track. The bye week offers a crucial moment for introspection and strategy realignment. While uncertainty can be daunting, it can also be a catalyst for growth and improvement. For the Cowboys, embracing this moment of change may just be the key to turning their season around.

As fans, we’ll be watching closely to see how these adjustments unfold. Will the Cowboys rise to the occasion, or will they continue to struggle? Only time will tell, but one thing is for sure: the next few weeks will be pivotal in determining the trajectory of this season.

Sources

– “Schottenheimer: ‘Bigger changes’ coming after Cowboys bye week – Dallas Cowboys | Official Site of the Dallas Cowboys”. (No URL available for this specific article, but for further insights, check the official Dallas Cowboys website.)

As always, keep your eyes on the field and your hearts with the team!